How do you feel about AI altering a family photo?
You want to see what your ancestors looked like, including any blemishes.
But they didn’t!
How deceived might you be?
From the earliest days, photographers used pencils, brushes, and etching tools directly on the glass plate negative to soften wrinkles, lighten skin blemishes, or sharpen outlines.
Later, retouching became a standard studio practice. Skilled specialized “retouchers” (often women) worked on negatives to smooth complexions, slim faces, or brighten eyes.
From the 1920, with roll film and gelatin silver prints, airbrushing became common.
Here’s what the Ottawa Daily Citizen of Monday, July 6, 1874, included in an article, Artistic Photography in Ottawa, about the Notman (later Topley) Studio.
A skillful retoucher who takes out all markings in the face, softens all lines and makes folks “beautiful for ever.” ‘This is indeed one of the most interesting departments in the establishment. To compare the rough proof with the finished print, it seems almost incredible that both are from the same negative.
AI may only be doing what a retoucher would do. Mild application of AI may be just another step in the progression (of deceit)? If it is mild, why acknowledge AI involvement? We don’t expect to see an acknowledgement of the retoucher’s work. Perhaps the photographer’s studio logo on the print serves as an acknowledgement that it has (likely) been retouched.
But AI may go much further. Where do you draw the line?