Here’s what NotebookLM makes of Saturday’s BIFHSGO meeting.
I’m not entirely happy with this, which feels like it’s stretching a point. It is interesting to see what NotebookLm can do with the BIFHSGO announcement as input.
Here’s what NotebookLM makes of Saturday’s BIFHSGO meeting.
I’m not entirely happy with this, which feels like it’s stretching a point. It is interesting to see what NotebookLm can do with the BIFHSGO announcement as input.
If you’ve saved bookmarks or links to Library and Archives Canada resources over the years, some of them may no longer work. Unfortunately, that means links you may have included in resource lists may no longer work.
LAC has been migrating the contents of nearly 80 legacy databases into its unified Collection search tool, and those older databases are now being decommissioned. Any links pointing to the old systems may be broken.
What to do:
Quietly on 15 December 2025, Library and Archives Canada stopped collecting the $5 fee for formal Access to Information requests.
LAC has updated its website to reflect this change. LAC is updating its web form to reflect this new situation, which will be launched soon.
In the meantime, LAC directs clients to the Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) ATIP Online Platform, which serves many departments and includes a fee request. If a client is requesting information from LAC, however, TBS does not require payment. If a client sends LAC a direct request for information and includes payment, it is returned to the client.
Eliminating even small fees typically leads to a surge in demand due to psychological effects like heightened positive affect and reduced barriers to entry. This pattern holds across health care, consumer goods, and digital services, driven by the psychological “zero-price effect,” in which free options attract disproportionately higher uptake.
This comes at a time when Library and Archives Canada is reducing staffing in the Access to Information Division to meet budget cuts. Perhaps LAC is planning more aggressive digitization, along with reducing ATIP scrutiny of WW2 service files.
Here’s a new free feature from MyHeritage. You can now display country flags for individuals in your tree based on key life events, transforming your family tree into a visual map of your origins.
Country coding is an optional feature that is currently available in all family tree views (Family, Pedigree, Fan, and List) on the MyHeritage website on desktop.
For further information, read the blog post here.
Choose from these selected free online events. All times are Eastern Time, unless otherwise noted. Registration may be required in advance—please check the links to avoid disappointment. For many more events, mainly in the U.S., visit ConferenceKeeper.
Tuesday, 10 March
2:30 PM: The Magic of Recording a Voice, a Story and a Family History, by Joe Collins for Allen County Public Library Genealogy Center.
https://acpl.libnet.info/event/15905474
7:00 PM: Artificial Intelligence & Genealogy, by Dave Obee for OGS Lambton Branch.
https://lambton.ogs.on.ca/events/artificial-intelligence-genealogy-by-david-obee/
7:00 PM: A River Runs Between Us, by Elaine Weeks and Chris Edwards for OGS Essex Branch.
https://essex.ogs.on.ca/meetings/essex-branch-march-2026-webinar-a-river-runs-between-us/
1:00 PM: Using landed estate records: tracing families in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, by Gillian Hunt for OGS Ireland SIG
https://ireland.ogs.on.ca/events/ireland-sig-march-webinar-using-landed-estate-records-tracing-families-in-the-eighteenth-and-nineteenth-century/
2:00 PM: Leveraging (US) Freedom of Information Laws to Procure Novel Records, by Alec Ferretti for Legacy Family Tree Webinars. https://familytreewebinars.com/webinar/leveraging-freedom-of-information-laws-to-procure-novel-records/
6:30 PM: Reading and Understanding Norwegian Records, by Tegan R. Price for Allen County Public Library Genealogy Center.
https://acpl.libnet.info/event/15848093
7:30 PM: The “Other” Census: Using School, Military, and Church Censuses, for OGS Simcoe County Branch. https://simcoeco.ogs.on.ca/events/
2:00 PM: Researching in Northumberland & Durham, by Paul Milner for Legacy Family Tree Webinars.
https://familytreewebinars.com/webinar/researching-in-northumberland-durham/
7:00 PM: Diaries Uncover the Daily Lives of Rural Families, by Catharine Anne Wilson for OGS Kent Branch.
https://kent.ogs.on.ca/events/kent-branch-march-2026-webinar-diaries-uncover-the-daily-lives-of-rural-families/
Everyone has a different RootsTech experience. Online, in each of the 63 time slots on the three main days, there was a choice of 208 sessions to attend (or not to attend). Believe it or not, that’s 3.67 × 10³⁸ possible conference experiences.
Here are the sessions I attended:
– FamilySearch Global Tech Forum 2026, with Robby Parker, Ian James and
Michelle Barber
-Finding and Accessing French Archives Online, by Sean Daly
– What’s New at Ancestry®, by Crista Cowan
– Delving Deeper into your family history: What’s new at Findmypast? by Jen Baldwin
– Genealogy, Upgraded: AI and Smart Tools on MyHeritage, by Daniel Horowitz
– FamilySearch Full-Text Search – Your Golden Path to Ancestral Discovery, by David Ouimette
– AI & Family History: Foundations & First Steps: Mastering AI Basics for Genealogy, by Steve Little
– Victorians to Elizabethans: British research in the twentieth century, by
Janet Few
– The Future of AI in Genealogy, with Dave Vance, David Ouimette, Diana Elder, Mark Thompson, Steve Little.
There wasn’t a dud presentation among them. New to me were Sean Daly, helpful for me in following a newly found French event, and David Ouimette with a plethora of Full-Text Search mini-case studies.
Ancestry and MyHeritage went heavy on AI. Findmypast, while far from ignoring it, gave greater attention to new resources, especially newspapers.
In the past month, FamilySearch has significantly expanded its Full-Text searchable archives with a focus on three major regions. The records span centuries (from the 1500s to 2026).
United States: This is the most dominant country in the list, with massive updates to state-specific records (New York, Oklahoma, New Jersey, and Michigan) and national collections. The largest single addition is the Military Service collection with over 31 million records, followed by New York Legal records (27 million).
Cuba: There were numerous small but localized updates focusing on specific provinces like Havana, Cienfuegos, Matanzas, and Holguín. These records are largely religious (church records), employment-based, and vital records (marriages and deaths).
Mexico: Substantial updates were made to records in Michoacan, Guanajuato, and Chihuahua. The Michoacan Marriages collection is particularly notable with over 1.1 million records added.
British Colonial America: A niche addition of New Jersey property records from the mid-1700s.
Miscellaneous items I found interesting this week.
Swedish BMDs
MyHeritage now has more than 33 million fully indexed records from the Lutheran Church books, complete with original images.
Search Sweden Births, 1850–1920
Search Sweden Marriages, 1850–1945
Search Sweden Deaths, 1850–1945
A Family History Of…
A new podcast from Findmypast has genealogist and research specialist Jen Baldwin is joined by guests to unravel remarkable family tales uncovered in the archives. Available on YouTube and elsewhere. The initial episode features celebrity guest historian Lucy Worsley recounting her ancestor’s experience in the Great War and during the Birmingham Blitz.
England & Wales, Prerogative Court of Canterbury Wills, 1384-1858
Ancestry has updated this collection to 1,012,964 records
The Anxiety of the Archive: The Heavy Burden of Digital Hoarding
YouTube: 20 Micro Habits Proven By Science to Change Your Life
Thanks to the following individuals for their comments and tips: Anonymous, Brenda Turner, Bryan Cook, Gail, Teresa, and Unknown.

Well-known Scottish genealogist Emma Maxwell — one half of the team behind Scottish Indexes — presents a webinar for the Bruce County Genealogical Society on Monday, 9 March at 7 p.m.
Using three case studies, each tackling a different research challenge, Emma demonstrates practical methods for overcoming genealogy brick walls.
In an excellent RootsTech presentation, FamilySearch Full-Text Search – Your Golden Path to Ancestral Discovery, David Ouimette mentioned that FamilySearch is prioritizing processing new records over those previously indexed manually.
He illustrated many cases in which witnesses and other terms, rather than the primary person in the record, were useful in surfacing relevant records through Full Text Search. As shown in the table, the ratio of full-text search records to the total number of records (birthplace) indicates that UK records are being given lower priority.
| Full Text (M) | Records (M) | Ratio | |
| UK | 22 | 454 | 0.048 |
| Mexico | 30 | 172 | 0.175 |
| US | 871 | 1,163 | 0.748 |
| Canada | 76 | 58 | 1.310 |
The ratio for Canada is likely deceptive owing to the large number of immigrants.
This week’s FMP additions offer a unique look at professional women in the interwar period and specialized religious records, alongside a diverse expansion of the newspaper archive.
This collection offers a chance to bridge the genealogical gap between the 1921 Census and the 1939 Register with 13,484 new records.
Transcripts and images may reveal qualifications, specific subjects taught (e.g., Classics, Mathematics), previous experience, memberships, and both home and institutional addresses.
It emphasizes secondary schools, training colleges, and higher education, and includes other educational roles (inspectors, lecturers, administrators) as well as teachers. It does not include the more than 120,000 elementary school teachers.
Published in partnership with University College London, this niche collection has just 497 records. documents the activities of a society founded in 1809 to encourage Jewish conversion. It includes baptismal records and “declaration records” regarding school enrollment and child vaccinations.
It often lists the child’s birth and baptism dates, parents’ names, father’s occupation, and residence. Many records center around “Palestine Place” in Bethnal Green.
The BNA collection, available through FMP, has expanded with 198,162 new pages, three new titles and significant updates to regional and trade publications.
New Titles:
Mining Journal: 48,202 pages (1857–1894). An essential resource for researching in the coal or metal mining industries.
The Star: 34,842 pages (1893–1918).
Antigua Times: 1,134 pages (1863–1876). A rare 19th-century Caribbean resource.
Notable Updates:
Wexford Independent: 9,030 pages (1875–1906).
Pawnbrokers’ Gazette: 11,240 pages (1839–1913).
Jersey Times and British Press: 10,562 pages (1870–1910).
Allen’s Indian Mail: 7,428 pages (1848–1886).
Grantham Journal: 12,410 pages (1972–1988).
In US practice, the Genealogical Proof Standard replaced the older “Preponderance of Evidence” rule in the late 20th century to distance genealogy from a purely legal definition. However, the GPS is essentially “Preponderance of Evidence” in a more expensive suit. While the Board for Certification of Genealogists (BCG) emphasizes that a “preponderance” (simply being 51% sure) is insufficient for formal proof, the GPS still relies on the researcher’s subjective assessment of “the weight of the evidence.” When you “resolve a conflict” between a death certificate and a family Bible, you are inherently deciding which piece of evidence is more reliable.
The GPS fails to escape the shadow of “preponderance” because “proof” in genealogy is never absolute; just a qualitative statement of probability based on a “reasonably exhaustive search.” By requiring a written conclusion that explains away contradictions, the GPS forces a researcher to build a narrative where one set of facts “outweighs” another. However, by claiming to be more rigorous than a “preponderance,” the GPS creates a false sense of security. If you follow the five steps, you have met the standard. What that means in reality is you have simply reached the most persuasive argument allowed by the surviving (and sometimes biased) documentation.
A better approach would be to require, and state in your conclusion, a quantitative probability estimate. I wrote about this approach, with a case study, a decade ago in the Spring 2016 issue of BIFHSGO’s Anglo-Celtic Roots in Confidence and the Genealogical Proof Standard.